Implementation of public policy bias and Countermeasures

Public policy issues in the modern paranoia many countries are present. With the social, political, economic, cultural and development of the population, more and more problems mutually uncoordinated, leading to the implementation of public policies appear paranoid become increasingly serious situation. From the mid-1990s, China's in March 2006 on the Fourth Session of the Tenth National People's Congress for the first time \① At present, China's implementation of public policy in the entire administrative activities showed an increasingly important role. With China's rapid development of domestic economic reform, international trade becomes more prosperous, and brought the execution of public policy issues are also increasing. In order to maintain our national public policy to bring harmony and healthy development, the government in the implementation of public policies, when bound to ponder, be cautious. Although the implementation of public policies in our country has made some achievements, but there are still many problems execute bias. How to regulate and correct execution of public policy paranoia is a need to discuss the issue. In this paper, political science, administrative science, sociology and other disciplines of the basic theory, basic theory of public policy implementation, content and implementation of public policy significance, are described and analyzed, analysis of the implementation of public policies and Causes of Errors , and finally proposes to prevent and avoid bias Public Policy Implementation' dissertation">Public Policy Implementation Strategy's recommendations. This total is divided into four parts: The first part is an introduction. Main topic of this article is to briefly explain the reason, current research, and related research at home and abroad of the sort described in this paper research ideas and research methods. This chapter also describes the structure and innovation inadequacies. The second part is about the definition of the concept of public policy implementation and Theory. This section is divided into three sections, the first section defines the meaning of public policy implementation and characteristics, there are four main features: (1) the clarity of performance goals; (2) executing an object restrictive; (3) the implementation process dynamic; (4) implementation of the main collaborative. The second section analyzes the constraints of public policy implementation of various factors, there are three main aspects: First, the implementation of policies themselves factors; Second, the implementation of policies outside factors; Third, policy issues characteristic factors constraining. The third section explains the significance of the implementation of public policies, mainly in three aspects: (1) the implementation of public policy is the implementation of the policy process in the throat; (2) the implementation of public policy is to achieve the policy objectives of the toolbox; (3), policy implementation distribution policy is the main interests of balance. Analysis of the third part is the implementation of public policy status quo bias. This section analyzes the execution of public policy bias main performance. (1) The signature policy implementation; (2) additional style policy implementation; (3) type of policy implementation incomplete; (4) Alternative style policy implementation; (5) wait-style policy implementation; (6) by gourd painted scoop-style policy implementation. Secondly describes the implementation of public policy the main reason for bias, including; First, our policy itself of reasons, including a code of conduct policy conflicts with the objective reality; lack of clarity in the policy itself, not about policy coherence, policy and more unchanged. Second, the main reason for policy implementation. Main policy body from the quality of the legal system, each subject between the interests, contradictions and conflicts three characteristics to Comment. Third, for policy implementation system is imperfect cause analysis, including (a) information communication policy implementation mechanism is not perfect, low efficiency; (2) the implementation of public policy power structure is not reasonable; (3) the monitoring of the implementation of public policy mechanism ineffective. The fourth part is about the prevention and avoidance of Public Policy Implementation Suggestions bias. This section for the above-mentioned problem, a correct and standardize the implementation of public policy measures bias problem. Include: (a) improving the administrative system, improve the policy execution; (2) to improve the quality of policy implementation body; (3) improving policy implementation supervision system; (4) increase the policy advocacy efforts; (5) the formulation of public policy specification , to improve its quality.