|School||Qufu Normal University|
|Course||Historical Theory and History|
|Keywords||Historical Six Zhang Xue-cheng Zhang Taiyan Hu Shi Qian Mu|
Through the history of the relationship is a critical issue in traditional Chinese academic history, its cause division and was the the ancient scholars focus of attention, leaving a lot of talk. Among them, go through into the history become the Wang Yangming since one begins to take shape gradually striking views, Zhang Xue-cheng, made it clear that the Historical Six proposition can be described as the culmination of this school views. Zhang Xuecheng their school when the world is not significant, and Shigemitsu in modern times. Modern times, the incoming of Western, Chinese and Western conflict, the traditional subject of reflection. Process of reflection, some have been orthodox detractors alternative scholars and their academic thinking cause for concern, Zhang Xue-cheng is one of them. Triumph of science, \ZHANG, Hu Shi, Qian Mu and other scholars gave different interpretations of \So there are various different interpretations and interpretations, because of their positions, ideas and the cause of their position on the concept of life experiences, academic origin and cultural background. Zhang Taiyan by the Classical \its rightful place in the history of world culture. Hu Shi departure from the position of the modern historian, \historians transformed into a Western historians, historians of science to create a traditional modern academic. Qian Mu not agree with the view of Zhang Taiyan and Hu Shi, look at the history of real history, objective standpoint, that s \Qian Mu, this essence also applies to modern historians. Individual interpretation and interpretation of whether or not in line with the intention of Zhang Xue-cheng, there is cause for concern and emphasis on value, not only because they reflect all the understanding of the traditional history of that era Chinese scholars and demonstrate they get through traditional and modern inter-relate various exploration and efforts made to provide valuable experience for the development of Chinese historiography. Chinese historiography to achieve the conversion from traditional to modern, or at least should work from the following four aspects: First, historians values ??shift; Second, historical science concepts and methods of change; historian of specialization and professionalism ; Fourth, historical research theory and methods widely used. In this paper, the theory of Yu Ying-shih about the academic development of the Inner Logic, as well as some of the theories and methods of hermeneutics and the history of ideas, the different interpretations of this classic text are placed in a historical time and space, to break through the political ideology the shackles of limitations and narrow-minded nationalism concept, study the idea of ??continuity and variation in of different the historian body and different historical periods to explore the traditional proposition in the context of modern Chinese and Western conflict, how to play the Chinese academic from the traditional to the Modern Transformation of the intermediary role and set up the bridge. Seeing new understanding of traditional Chinese culture, and the direction of the Academic Transition in China, reflects the characteristics of transition mode.