The Evidence of Judicial Authentication Conclusion Ability Examination

Appraisal conclusion as an important legal evidence, although its record contents have is objective, but essentially it still is a speculative opinion.So, appraisal conclusion, of course, should not have evidence ability, and must submit the court, after the facts of examination, judge judge, can eventually determine whether they have evidence capacity, namely are allowed to enter the courtroom as evidence as evidence that case investigation and facts.The judge must follow the evidence rules, judge appraisal conclusion evidence ability and proof force, and the other evidence in the case, the comprehensive judging each seal. Appraisal conclusion is not "scientific judgment," nor "king" of evidence.Judges often to appraisal conclusion had a blind superstitious, but sometimes it is a superstition that led to the occurrence of a crime. Appraisal conclusion with special objective authenticity, and the possibility of containing distortion.In inter alia in judicial practice by the judge not according to the evidence rules should be to decide,appraisal conclusion must pass, cross-examination shown, identify attempted such tribunal investigating the procedures verified as the resulting