Research on the Structure of Sports Anatomy Materials of P.E.Education in the Universities of China
|School||Fujian Normal University|
|Course||Physical Education and Training|
|Keywords||Sports Anatomy Materials Structure of Teaching Material Comparison|
The course structure refers to the regular organizating form between the inner parts and ingredients of the textbook, and its rationalization plays a vital role on teaching material’s effect and function.This research uses the methods of documentary, questionnaire,mathematical statistics, comparative research and logical induction method, mainly based on the analysis of structure of China higher edu press’s "motion anatomy", edition 2006, making analysis on changes of the textbook structure on sports anatomy since reform and opening in China, meanwhile, comparing and analyzing horizontally with the Roger Watson,from United States,<simply anatomy and physiology> (hereinafter referred to as "the anatomy physiology) teaching material structure, then investigating the users of the teaching material with questionnaire,to explore and analyse advantages and limitations in design of the textbook structure. The results of the study indicate that:sports teaching anatomy structure constantly makes creative efforts, but its substantial structure should give a consideration on student’ actual learning need, the textbook knowledge content should be simplified, more attention should be paid on the basic and applied knowledge content and the integrity and comprehensive subject. In addition certain inadaption still exists be-tween the structure design and practical use of the material, and certain disadvantages, such as unable to arouse the students’ enthusiasm are still existing in the course.Through this research on the development of sports anatomy textbook structure and the design of teaching material from abroad, and the expectation to get some sports anatomy textbook structure design method and the suggestion that are suitable for our country, and the feedback from users, such three aspects, I hope to puts forward some suggestions on making the teaching material structure design more rational for users.