Research on Development and Practice about Freud’s Psychoanalytic Criticism in China
|School||Anhui Normal University|
|Course||Literature and Art|
|Keywords||Freud psychoanalytic criticism critical practice Chinese Characteristics|
Domestic researchers criticized Freud’s psychoanalytic theory and the study of Chinese literary criticism, most of them focused on the exploring of a simple theory, or simply formulated the history of development, few of them integrated the "history" with "theory". I tried to move in the direction of exploring what kind of needs did Freud’s psychoanalysis, critical theory, literary criticism meet the internal and literary criticism in China, what kind of culture and quality problems has it brought to China. With all this questions, I have offered some of my own thinking, with a hope of solving them jointly.This paper analyzes the criticism of Freud’s psychoanalytic theory, as well as its Chinese literary and art criticism in perspective and methodological impact of Freud’s psychoanalytic criticism; explores the concrete practice in China’s history: development features and successes and failures. At the same time, the paper focused on the analysis of the more conscious application of Freudian psychoanalysis, literary criticism, criticism of models of research, because they show a kind of revolution in methodology and ways of thinking in the expansion representing the localization, nationalization, the choice of features. On the basis Sorting the history, combining with theoretical study, the paper grasped Freud’s psychoanalytic criticism with Chinese characteristics, of which the most striking points are criticism and psychology, sociology, critical combination.