On Roland Barthes’Deconstructive Thoughts

In its different academic periods, Roland Barthes work explores key obviously different. Literary researchers often applied in different periods according to their methods and theories are divided and labeled \French structuralists, but also one of the pioneers of deconstruction. However, if we convert research perspective, comprehensive study of works of different periods of its research priorities, it is easy to come to another conclusion: in fact, its research and exploration of the text is always in the deconstruction of the constituent elements. His deconstruction of the text include: \The main goal of deconstruction is the \Deconstruction that \The structure in order to subvert the authority and historic significance. Obviously, Roland Barthes attempts to deconstruct the main elements of the text, and ultimately achieve its deconstruction of the text, to achieve its goal of deconstruction. This paper attempts to analyze important works of its parts, to discuss Roland Barthes's deconstruction thinking, argumentation always runs through the deconstruction of their efforts. The full text of five parts. The first part is the introduction. Brief study of contemporary Western thinkers way total time from the last transition aptitude historical necessity to introduce the general characteristics of deconstruction. Pointed out the importance of contemporary Western thinkers Roland Barthes's general representative of \The second part of the main Roland Barthes various periods of academic research totality introduction. Through its \and continuity, ignoring its ideological deconstruction consistency and leads below. The third part by Roland Barthes's analysis of important works of different periods, indicating its deconstruction thinking in research and exploration of the expression. Its deconstruction of the text is the text of the main elements of deconstruction achieved: \Z \The fourth part, to Roland Barthes's most important \, but also pointed out that the \Full papers last part is the conclusion. Through the analysis of the above four parts, this paper argues, Roland Barthes various periods of study and explore different focus, the application of research methods and theories vary, also put forward a different theoretical perspective, it seems that their study and explore its theoretical perspectives are not linked, fragmented, but are essentially its deconstruction different ideas embodied in various periods, conducted by Roland Barthes is the deconstruction of the text, in order to achieve its ultimate goal of deconstruction: \\