Of minority shareholders of the company the right to appeal and judicial interfering with the balance of the scales
|School||University of Foreign Trade and Economic|
|Keywords||Interests of minority shareholders Judicial relief Fair Corporate Governance Efficiency|
In today's corporate governance structure , the controlling shareholder , director , respectively, from a different point of view to a certain extent control the affairs of the company . The controlling shareholder of the affairs of the company 's decision-making power from the capital of the majority \Of minority shareholders in the company is subject to the others . However, directors and controlling shareholders are often competing with their capacity as directors of the \From the company of minority shareholders on the Company's controlling shareholder , the behavior of directors ( both identity often competing ) request for judicial review and relief angle , visits the newly revised \a balance between the social effects of the intervention in the judicial review of corporate governance . judicial process involved a degree of protection of the interests of minority shareholders of the Company and how the problem is a result of time , depending on the country , because of cultural background , due to the development stage of differentiation . Famous Justice Cardoso once said , \In this paper, traced evaluation judicial remedy of Britain and other countries involved in corporate governance , maintenance on the basis of the historical evolution of the legitimate rights and interests of minority shareholders , from the point of view of comparative law , seeks to explore in the stage of economic development in China today , in a culture with Chinese characteristics under the legal background , how to grasp the balance between the judicial process involved in corporate governance and protection of small retail investors (shareholders ) , and how to achieve a balance between fairness and efficiency .